Kids Company: Alan Yentob under fire from MPs for ‘catalogue of failure’ at charity
Mr Yentob, the charity’s chairman, was 'negligent', according to a damning report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former trustees of Kids Company have accused MPs behind a highly critical report of “naively” accepting criticisms made by people hostile to the charity.
Alan Yentob, the charity’s former chairman, will be accused of presiding over an “extraordinary catalogue of failure” and “financial mismanagement” that let down vulnerable children and ultimately led to the organisation’s collapse.
In a damming report, Parliament’s Public Administration Committee said Mr Yentob was “negligent” and “suspended (his) critical faculties”, by allowing Kids Company’s charismatic chief executive, Camila Batmanghelidjh, to spend millions of pounds with little or no oversight.
But in a robust statement, the former trustees of Kids Company including Mr Yentob accused MPs of having “naively accepted allegations made in the media and by a small number of individuals, some with vested interests in damaging Kids Company and its much-praised model of loving care and practical support” at the expense of the evidence of expert witnesses.
“It is a regrettable feature of British democracy that the committee can use the curtain of parliamentary privilege to produce what is an irresponsible report, immune from the defamation claims that would inevitably follow without this privilege,” they said.
Mr Yentob and the other trustees described the report as “inaccurate, unbalanced and irresponsible”.
The report also castigated politicians from the Prime Minister down for being “captivated” by Ms Batmanghelidjh and authorising multi-million pound grants to the charity “outside the usual decision-making process”.
This, it added, was done on the basis of “little more than their relationship with a charismatic leader, small-scale studies and anecdotes”.
The committee also concluded that Kids Company helped just a fraction of the children it claimed to be working with – in some cases counting a whole class of children as “clients” if they benefited from work with just one individual. It added that while Kids Company said it was working with 18,000 children, only 1,900 youngsters were passed onto Southwark Council when the organisation closed last August.
The charity, it said, misused funds to pay for luxury items for clients that “diverted” money from other projects.
An audit of the charity’s books found purchases of £305 designer shoes, John Lewis throws which cost £80 each and “four items of men’s outerwear costing £149, £105, £85 and £70”. The committee said such spending was “inappropriate, unwise and irresponsible”.
The committee reserved particular criticism for the Cabinet Office Minister, Oliver Letwin, who, it said, failed to provide a “convincing justification” for ignoring the “comprehensive advice” of senior civil servants and hand over £3m to Kids Company just before it collapsed. The committee said this was a dereliction of his duty in handling taxpayer money.
Bernard Jenkin, the Conservative chair of the Administration Committee, said they had heard evidence of what “could only be described as an extraordinary catalogue of failures”.
Mr Letwin said the Government would pay “careful attention” to the report’s findings and would be “reviewing our grant-giving process”.
He did not address the personal criticism directed at him.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments