Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Afghanistan campaign 'set to cost £4bn'

Gavin Cordon
Thursday 28 July 2011 07:10 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

British military operations in Afghanistan are set to cost the taxpayer more than £4 billion this year, it was disclosed today.

The Ministry of Defence estimates the additional cost for 2011-12 at £4.025 billion, to be met from the Treasury reserve.

The figures - released by the Commons Defence Committee - represent a fall on the previous year's estimate of £4.4 billion.

However the committee expressed concern that the true cost this year could again be closer to £4.4 billion, after the MoD warned that the estimate represented 90% of forecast costs.

The MoD said that the 90% figure had been included on the advice of the Treasury in order to reflect the "significant volatility" of the costs involved.

The committee said the figures covered only the additional cost of operations and did not reflect the true cost of Britain's military commitment in Afghanistan.

"While it is true that personnel would be paid, and equipment procured and used (largely for training purposes), even if the armed forces were not engaged in operations, their deployment brings with it additional costs in terms of training opportunities cancelled or deferred and equipment wear and tear that will eventually have to be met," the committee said.

"We recommend that the department make an estimate of the full cost of military operations."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in