Hillsborough judgment could redefine murder
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A DECISION allowing doctors to stop artificially feeding an unconscious victim of the Hillsborough stadium disaster could involve a redefinition of the law of murder, one of the five Law Lords considering the case said yesterday.
Commenting on the dilemma presented by the 'highly distressing and difficult' case of Tony Bland, 21 - who has been in a persistent vegetative state for three years with no prospect of recovery - Lord Browne-Wilkinson observed: 'The court has to redefine murder in the light of new technology.'
James Munby QC, for the Official Solicitor, who is representing Mr Bland's interests, maintained that withdrawing the patient's feeding tube 'would be a criminal act and has the necessary intention to make it murder'.
'The significance of this appeal hardly requires emphasis . . . The question for your Lordships is whether you can deprive a patient of life-sustaining treatment simply and solely on the basis of outsiders' evaluation of the quality, or lack of quality of that patient's life.'
The High Court and the Court of Appeal have already ruled that feeding can be withdrawn in line with the wishes of Mr Bland's parents. The hearing is expected to last two or three days.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments