Heathrow rail link may be delayed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE OPENING of the rail link between London and Heathrow airport seems certain to be delayed beyond the original 1997 target date after negotiators failed to reach an agreement yesterday, writes Christian Wolmar.
The talks between the Government, the chairmen of British Rail and British Airports Authority, which owns Heathrow, had been called by John MacGregor, Secretary of State for Transport, in an effort to resolve disputes over funding and use of the line.
BR sources said that the talks over the pounds 300m link, which had been close to breakdown, 'were now looking more promising. We are slightly more optimistic.' However, no date has been set for further talks.
The 14-minute service from Paddington, west London, covering 16 miles of track, was due to begin operating by 1997, but a start on the scheme has been delayed by the dispute between BAA and BR, which centres on charges for using the track. BR wants BAA to pay pounds 6m a year to use 12 miles of existing track, which it would have to share with InterCity.
A BR source said: 'We don't know what track-charging regime will be put forward by the Government for privatisation and we are worried that if we give BAA an easy ride, it will set a precedent for other users.'
BAA wants to pay marginal costs for using the track which it hopes will carry between 6 million and 7 million passengers per year.
Rail warning, page 23
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments