Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hatton trial allegations 'unfounded'

Monday 08 March 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PROSECUTION was accused yesterday of 'scraping the barrel' in its case against a defendant in the trial of Derek Hatton, former deputy leader of Liverpool City Council, and three others.

Richard Henriques QC, who is defending John Nelson, made the claim as speeches for the defence began at Mold Crown Court, North Wales. Mr Hatton, Mr Nelson and Hannah Folan, both former Labour councillors, and a businessman, John Monk, deny conspiring to defraud Liverpool City Council by arranging for Mr Monk to be leased land at the city's Brownlow Hill for less than its market value.

Mr Hatton, Mr Monk and Mr Nelson deny a similar charge in relation to land at Manesty's Lane in the city centre. No evidence has been called on behalf of Mr Hatton and the others.

Mr Henriques said the prosecution had made four serious allegations against Mr Nelson, chairman of the council's estates sub-committee: that he failed to put property out to tender, he was paid money, he 'fixed planners' and manipulated committee minutes.

But all the evidence had shown that these allegations were unfounded or, in the case of tendering, inappropriate. 'Failure to put land out to tender was the very cornerstone of the Crown case, but it melted away . . .'

He added: 'You may feel this is now a barrel-scraping exercise.'

The hearing continues today.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in