Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Greenpeace makes a last stand over nuclear waste plant: Judicial review is final hope for opponents of pounds 2.8bn Thorp reprocessing site

Nicholas Schoon,Environment Correspondent
Monday 07 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GREENPEACE launched its last- ditch attempt to halt the Thorp nuclear reprocessing plant at Sellafield in the High Court yesterday, with the opening of a judicial review hearing.

The environmental group, joined by Lancashire County Council, is claiming that John Gummer, Secretary of State for the Environment, and Gillian Shephard, Minister of Agriculture, were wrong to grant British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) authorisations for radioactive emissions from Thorp without first holding a public inquiry.

If Mr Justice Potts finds against the Government, it would delay the start of full-scale operations for months and raise the prospect of the pounds 2.8bn plant never opening.

Thorp, at Sellafield on the Cumbrian coast, was completed more than a year ago and BNFL says the delays are costing nearly pounds 2m a week.

About 2,000 people work at the plant, which reprocesses spent fuel from nuclear reactors into uranium, plutonium and radioactive wastes.

BNFL has just moved the first three tonnes of spent fuel into the plant and wants to fragment it within the next fortnight. That will be the point of no return - from then on, parts of the plant will be highly radioactive and expensive to decommission.

Andrew Collins QC, counsel for Greenpeace, told the court: 'The process leading to the authorisations was flawed and there ought to have been a public inquiry before the relevant decisions were taken.'

He alleged that the ministers had failed to consult the public properly, failed to provide necessary information during the consultation process, and 'misunderstood what they should have taken into account'.

There were two rounds of consultation last year. Mr Gummer said he was not legally obliged to carry out the second round - on the broader question of justification for the plant - but had wanted to.

Mr Collins said it was not a 'genuine consultation process'. He claimed the Government had only embarked on it 'to protect its back' from judicial review.

He said BNFL should have made several key documents publicly available, including contracts with foreign clients who will send nuclear waste to Sellafield and a report by Touche Ross, the accountants, which is said to outline the economic justification for the plant. Even Mr Gummer had not seen the Touche Ross report, he added.

The scale of the annual radioactive emissions from Thorp meant that the authorisations involved were 'the biggest there have ever been, or are ever likely to be', Mr Collins said.

Lancashire has decided to join Greenpeace's fight because it borders Cumbria and believes a small number of people within the county could receive annual doses of radioactivity, slightly above the Government's precautionary limit, due to the plant's operations.

The costs of the hearing, which will last at least five days, are expected to run to several hundred thousand pounds. Greenpeace has raised more than pounds 200,000 through an appeal and has also secured the backing of Sir James Goldsmith, the Anglo-French tycoon who has environmental sympathies.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in