'Green' lobby attacks Sizewell consultations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ENVIRONMENTAL lobby groups yesterday denounced as a 'charade' the Government's decision to hold consultations over radioactive discharges from the new pounds 2bn Sizewell B nuclear power station nearing completion in Suffolk, writes Tom Wilkie.
When it starts operating, towards the middle of next year, the Sizewell pressurised water reactor will routinely discharge small amounts of radioactivity into the sea and the air. Such discharges have to be authorised both by the Minstry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food and by HM Inspectorate of Pollution.
Environmental protection legislation requires that before the Government grants an authorisation it should formally seek the views of local authorities and other 'statutory consultees'.
The Sizewell consultation period begins today and ends on 8 October. But Patrick Green, radiation campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said yesterday: 'They are not going to pull the plug on Sizewell as a result of two months of consultations over the summer. The consultations have to go to the heart of the issue: is there a justification, in terms of some benefit, for the risk that is posed?'
Although the impact of Sizewell will be small in comparison with the controversial nuclear reprocessing plant at Sellafield, according to Mr Green: 'You have to ask what is the justification, what is the benefit and are there other ways of attaining it?'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments