Mordaunt: no blank cheque for nuclear deterrent
SNP MP Patricia Gibson raised concerns about the UK’s debt levels
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is “no blank cheque” for the UK’s nuclear deterrent, Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt has said.
She was speaking in the Commons after SNP MP Patricia Gibson questioned whether the programme should continue given wider cost pressures.
The SNP does not support the retention or renewal of the Trident deterrence system, which is operated from HM Naval Base Clyde in Scotland.
A programme to replace the submarines used for the continuous-at-sea Trident deterrence system is currently under way.
Ms Gibson (North Ayrshire and Arran) said: “For the first time since 1961 UK Government debt has risen above 100% of GDP, with the Office for National Statistics revealing that net debt reached £2.6 trillion as of the end of May.”
She asked the Commons Leader whether she believes “a blank cheque for replacing Trident is either acceptable or sustainable” given “the huge pressure on public finances”.
Ms Mordaunt said: “I don’t think this Government should take any lessons from the SNP Government that has nearly £2 billion between what it spends and what is in its budget.
“In addition to understanding cost and the price of everything, I think it is also important that (we) in this place understand the value of things.”
She added: “There is no blank cheque for the nuclear deterrent. But it is there doing a vitally important job.
“If (MPs) can’t see the merits of us having a deterrent, at this moment, I don’t know that they are ever going to be able to grasp this.
“Commitments to having a nuclear deterrent are pretty fundamental to being a member of Nato,” she added.
The cost of maintaining the nuclear deterrent is estimated at £3 billion for this year, with between £31 billion and £41 billion set aside for the wider programme of replacing the Vanguard-class submarines with new Dreadnought submarines, according to figures from the House of Commons Library.