UK foreign aid cuts will lead to thousands of deaths, ministers warned
The consequences will be particularly dire for women’s health and wellbeing, leading to unsafe abortions and maternal deaths, assessments show.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hundreds of thousands more women will face unsafe abortions and thousands will die in pregnancy and childbirth as a result of the UK aid cuts in 2023-24, Foreign Office ministers were warned in an internal assessment.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) published its programme allocations for the next two years last month, showing that Official Development Assistance (ODA) spend is due to rise marginally in 2023-24 and then rise by 12% in 2024-25 to £8.3 billion.
Whilst the projections do signal an increase, ODA spend is yet to return to pre-2020 levels, which is when the Government decided to temporarily reduce it from 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) to 0.5%.
An equality impact assessment conducted by the FCDO was provided to ministers earlier this year to inform their decisions on where significant cuts to the budget for 2023-24 would fall.
The assessment, provided to and published by the International Development Committee (IDC), made several examples showing the potential effects on groups with protected characteristics due to reductions in spend on programmes which specifically target vulnerable and marginalised groups.
In particular, it highlighted the consequences for women’s health and wellbeing, leading to unsafe abortions and maternal deaths.
In relation to women and girls in Afghanistan, it said: “Due to the scale of the ODA reductions (76%) in Afghanistan, the FCDO will not be able to support critical services for women and girls.
“Since returning to power, the Taliban has imposed restrictions on women and girls; preventing them from enjoying their human rights and systematically erasing them from public spaces.
“Therefore, reducing funding will potentially leave some of the most vulnerable women and girls in the world without critical services.”
On sexual and reproductive health rights, it said about Pan Africa: “Spend reductions on the Women’s Integrated Sexual Health Programme (WISH) will mean that the programme’s results for women and girls would be reduced by approximately 60%.
“The number of couple years of protection (CYPs) provided will drop from nearly 3 million to around 1.1 million; the number of unsafe abortions averted from nearly 300,000 to approximately 115,000; number of maternal deaths averted will drop from 2,531 to just over 1,000.”
On Yemen, the report added: “Half a million women and children in Yemen will not receive healthcare and fewer preventable deaths will be avoided. It may cause lasting damage to health systems in Yemen, if other donors are unable to fund.”
According to the assessment, girls’ education in Ethiopia will also be compromised and violence against women and girls in South Sudan and Somalia will not receive adequate attention and response.
Moreover, cuts to disability, religion, and LGBT+ inclusion efforts in various countries will affect vulnerable groups, limiting access to improved learning environments, healthcare, and support services.
In a letter sent alongside the full equality impact assessment to the Labour chairwoman of the IDC Sarah Champion in July, Foreign Office minister Andrew Mitchell said the report had been “a key component of allocation decision-making”.
The Foreign Office minister also included a paper showing the adjustments that were made in response to equality considerations and to “ensure support reached the most vulnerable”.
The paper said the “limited funds meant not all equality impacts could be mitigated but, using in-year underspends and other resources identified by officials, FCDO ministers made adjustments which included the following 23-24 funding uplifts targeted at helping the most vulnerable and those with a relevant protected characteristic”.
The funding uplifts included an increase to Afghanistan’s 23-24 allocation by £41 million, to £100 million to allow the continuation of humanitarian and women and girls’ programmes, and an increase to Yemen’s 23-24 allocation by £32 million, to £87 million, for the humanitarian response.
There was also an increase to Syria’s allocation by £30 million, to £77 million, and to Somalia’s allocation by £30 million, to £90 million, while providing £12 million to central humanitarian and health programmes focused on sexual and reproductive health and rights, and £21 million to Non-Governmental Organisations supporting the most vulnerable.
Ms Champion said: “By the FCDO’s own assessment, critical support to tackle malnutrition will not be delivered. Programmes aimed at reaching those furthest behind – including women, girls and people with disabilities – will be cut. Hundreds of thousands more women once again face unsafe abortions, thousands will die in pregnancy and childbirth.
“There will be a further political hit to the UK’s leadership on global and regional programmes.
“These must have been intolerable decisions for officials to make, and it is hard to see how the terrible impact set out here sits with FCDO’s recently restated commitment to ‘persuade more of our fellow citizens that international development is core to our own national interest as well as the right thing to do’.
“It is crucial that promised uplifts in the planned allocations for 2024/25 go to the people with protected characteristics who, by FCDO’s own assessment, have borne the brunt of these cuts.”
A Foreign Office spokesman said: “UK aid spending is due to increase to £8.3bn next year, and will be focused on programmes addressing humanitarian crises, protecting women and girls and supporting the world’s most vulnerable, while delivering value for money for taxpayers.
“While the budget for low-income countries has had to be reduced in the short term to achieve our savings target it is due to nearly double for these countries the year after, including in Africa where aid will rise from £646m to £1.364bn.”