GMC clears doctors who alleged race bias
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TWO DOCTORS who made allegations of racial bias among their health service colleagues have been cleared of unprofessional conduct. The General Medical Council launched an investigation after secret research revealed discrimination against doctors from ethnic minority groups.
Aneez Esmail, a senior registrar, and Sam Everington, a general practitioner, concluded that medical staff with non-English sounding names were losing out in the battle for jobs. During their inquiries they were arrested by fraud squad police and questioned about making fraudulent job applications - but not prosecuted.
The GMC began an investigation into their conduct before the research conclusions were published in the British Medical Journal. Now Dr Esmail, 36, and Dr Everington, 35, have been told the council will not be pursuing the accusation. But they were warned the 'information will be retained in the council's records'.
Dr Esmail, a lecturer in general practice at Manchester University, said yesterday: 'We now want to establish if that is a threat. Obviously the GMC was very angry about it, but I don't see that it has a right to be angry. It is ridiculous. It is a typical example of us being shot rather than the people committing the offence.'
Their seven-month research involved sending out virtually identical job applications and CVs for a number of senior house officer posts at hospitals around the country.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments