Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Girl is reconciled with family after separation case

Tuesday 01 December 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE 14-year-old girl who took court action for the right to live away from her parents has become reconciled with her family under a private agreement reached in the High Court yesterday.

The judge made a plea to the media for the girl to be allowed to get on with her life, but he did not reveal whether she had been granted her wish to carry on living with her 18-year-old boyfriend's family.

Settlement of her case came after lengthy out-of-court talks, conducted through lawyers, between the girl, her mother and the mother of her boyfriend.

The agreement was sanctioned at a private hearing by the President of the Family Division, Sir Stephen Brown, who last month made the girl a ward of court at her mother's request.

Sir Stephen emphasised that it was not a case of a 'precocious or wilful young lady' trying to assert her independence by 'divorcing' her parents.

He said that the girl had been troubled by pressures at home in the aftermath of divorce proceedings between her parents. She had gone to live with her boyfriend's family and then sought help through the courts, as she was entitled to do.

Under the agreement, the girl will remain a ward of court, with the Official Solicitor, David Venables, acting as her legal guardian.

It was a 'relaxed situation', the judge said, and it was vital that the girl should not be harassed or subjected to publicity.

The girl, from Ilford, east London, described by the judge as sensitive and intelligent, cannot be named for legal reasons.

The dispute over where she should be allowed to live began when she instructed solicitors who obtained a 'prohibited steps' order from a judge at Guildford County Court which prevented her parents taking her away from the boyfriend's home in Surrey.

She brought her case under the 1989 Children Act which allows children, for the first time, to initiate proceedings and instruct a solicitor to make applications to the courts. The case moved to the High Court when she sought a 'residence order' allowing her to stay where she wanted.

Sir Stephen said that the girl had a hereditary medical condition which gave rise to stress when she was under pressure. It was to avoid pressure that she went to live with her boyfriend's family.

The county court order she obtained was 'rather stringent' and the case was transferred to the High Court.

Since then the Official Solicitor had obtained reports from an adolescent psychiatrist and another specialist. As a result, an agreement was reached keeping the girl under the court's supervision.

'Her future is being considered carefully and she has every opportunity of a very bright future,' the judge said.

Sir Stephen said that the girl's parents, her boyfriend and his mother were 'people of the highest integrity and character'.

He added: 'I have seen a school report on the boyfriend which is most impressive and which speaks of his responsibility and his very clear intellectual attainments.'

In future, similar court applications by children should go straight to the High Court or be transferred if initiated in a lower court, he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in