Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Flynn ‘deeply confused’ by Sarwar statement on Gaza motion contact

The Scottish Labour leader had claimed his party was in contact with the SNP over a vote in the Commons this week.

Craig Paton
Monday 19 February 2024 07:28 EST
Stephen Flynn has offered to meet Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer to discuss the vote (Steve Welsh/PA)
Stephen Flynn has offered to meet Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer to discuss the vote (Steve Welsh/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn has said he is “deeply confused” as to why Anas Sarwar claimed Labour whips had been in contact with his party about its Gaza motion.

Mr Flynn’s party has forced a vote in the Commons, pushing for an immediate ceasefire in the region.

Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, the Scottish Labour leader said there had been contact between the two parties’ whips on a potential deal to support the motion.

I think that does Anas Sarwar a deep dis-service - maybe he's been spun a line by UK Labour and he's fallen for it, but it hasn't happened

SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn

Owen Thompson, the SNP’s chief whip, quickly rubbished the claims and Mr Flynn told journalists there had not been contact as of Monday morning.

“I’m deeply confused that Anas Sarwar took it upon himself to go on national television and to effectively lie and mislead the people of Scotland regarding Labour whips speaking to SNP whips,” he said after an event with First Minister Humza Yousaf in Aberdeen.

“That has not happened – that is categorically untrue.

“I think that does Anas Sarwar a deep dis-service – maybe he’s been spun a line by UK Labour and he’s fallen for it, but it hasn’t happened.”

On Sunday, Mr Flynn offered a meeting to Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer to discuss the vote, due to take place on Wednesday – but he stressed the aim of an immediate ceasefire must not be watered down.

“If there’s an opportunity for him to back our motion in relation to an immediate ceasefire, I’d like to have that discussion,” Mr Flynn said.

Speaking at the Scottish Labour conference in Glasgow on Sunday, Sir Keir said “fighting must stop now” in Gaza while those at the gathering of activists voted unanimously to back a ceasefire on Saturday.

Shadow foreign secretary David Lammy told broadcasters on Sunday the party was still considering its approach to the motion.

Asked if he would consider changes to the party’s motion, the SNP Westminster leader said: “I believe in an immediate ceasefire and I would encourage other party leaders to do likewise.”

Mr Flynn went on to claim the “appeasement of the UK Government simply isn’t working”.

“You can’t have 30,000 people killed, 70,000 injured, 1.4 million people sitting in Rafah which is usually home to about 170,000 to 180,000 people being bombarded by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF), and the United Kingdom, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a close ally of Israel, who of course have a vote in the United Nations, who sell arms to Israel, just sits back, sits silent, doesn’t do anything,” he said.

He added that history is “not going to be judging many people in Westminster particularly well”.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in