Fury over rail cuts disclosure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SIR BOB Reid, chairman of British Rail, was at the centre of another row last night after clashing with ministers over his admission to Labour that rail services will be reduced in May, writes Stephen Castle.
At a stormy meeting with John MacGregor, Secretary of State for Transport, last week, Sir Bob is said to have expressed regret at the incident and promised that it would not be repeated. However, BR said that no such assurance had been given by its chairman.
The row is the latest in a series between Sir Bob Mr MacGregor since he openly opposed the Government's proposals for rail privatisation last year.
The dispute arose after Brian Wilson, a Labour frontbench transport spokesman, requested information about the new BR timetable. Sir Bob's reply, used in a press release compiled by Mr Wilson, revealed a cut in services because of a 23 per cent reduction in government subsidy.
BR argued that the information had been openly discussed with local authorities and Transport Users' Consultative Committees and was, therefore, in the public domain. However, ministers were furious that Mr Wilson was given the information before it went to the department.
A BR spokesman said: 'The chairman cannot give assurances about how he deals with correspondence from MPs. He treats it on its merits.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments