Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former cult women to seek review of extradition order

Heather Mills
Wednesday 28 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TWO former members of the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh cult wanted in the US on a murder plot charge yesterday cleared the first hurdle in their fight against extradition, writes Heather Mills.

Two High Court judges gave them the go-ahead to seek a judicial review of the Home Secretary's extradition order.

The court decided that Sally Croft, 43, and Susan Hagan, 47, had an arguable case that Kenneth Clarke, the then Home Secretary, had not properly tested the reliability of the American evidence before granting the order on 26 April.

Ms Croft, an accountant, and Mrs Hagan, an aromatherapist, deny that while members of the sect in Oregon more than eight years ago they conspired to murder an attorney investigating the cult. They face a possible 25-year jail sentence.

No murder attempt was made and no charges were brought against the pair for five years. Lord Justice McGowan and Mr Justice Leonard were told that the evidence against the women consisted of statements from witnesses who had made plea bargains resulting in immunity from prosecution or lenient sentences.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in