Firm poised to quit HQ over radioactive leak
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BLUE Circle Cement said yesterday that it is likely to abandon its headquarters in Aldermaston, Berkshire, because of 'low level' radioactive contamination by the town's neighbouring weapons manufacturing plant, writes Andrew Gliniecki.
The Ministry of Defence said last night that the problem had occurred after exceptional flooding in 1989 caused contaminated water in surface drainage pools on the Aldermaston weapons site to seep across to the 125-acre Blue Circle Cement site.
Blue Circle is concerned that it has only just been informed of the contamination although tests were carried out in August and October 1990.
Blue Circle said it was given assurances that the site was safe when the company moved into the four-storey office building on the landscaped site eight years ago.
The company employs 150 people on the site and its tenants employ a further 60 staff.
Ian McKenzie, the company's chief executive, said: 'Our over- riding concern has been for the safety of staff and others visiting Aldermaston Court.'
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said there was no health risk and that the level of contamination 'was very, very low - scarcely above background levels'.
He said arrangements were being made to remove the contaminated soil from the site.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments