Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Exam board criticised for failing to include more works by female composers on piano syllabus

Just 4 per cent of pieces in graded examinations over past two decades were by women

Eleanor Busby
Education Correspondent
Sunday 22 December 2019 11:34 EST
Comments
Female composers want more works by women to be included on the music syllabus
Female composers want more works by women to be included on the music syllabus (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Britain’s largest music exam boards has come under fire for failing to include more female composers on its piano syllabus.

Only 4.4 per cent of works in all the Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM) piano syllabuses over the past two decades were by women, according to new research.

An analysis of 158 pieces on this year’s piano syllabus for ABRSM graded examinations, shared with the Sunday Times, found that exam lists for grades 4 and 6 include no female composers.

Composers are calling on exam boards to address the historic gender imbalance – especially at the more advanced grades.

Dr Angela Elizabeth Slater, composer and founder of Illuminate Women’s Music, who conducted the research, warned that a lack of diversity could affect pupil engagement.

Dr Slater said: “They could be actively doing more to dispel the myth of composer as male, and reflect our society today and music history, by including far more works by women composers.”

Her research found only 77 pieces by women on the syllabus from 1999 to 2019. “Works by women are often in the alternative lists and not in the main examinations books,” she told The Independent.

“This presents a further barrier for teachers and students to engage with this repertoire.”

Pam Wedgwood, one of the female composers on the ABRSM piano syllabus, says all exam boards need to do more to increase the works by females in the higher grades.

“It was a man’s world when I started and to a certain extent it still is,” she told The Independent.

Four years ago, exam board Edexcel was forced to overhaul its A-level music syllabus after a teenager won a campaign to ensure female composers were studied on the course.

Jessy McCabe launched a petition after discovering there were no women among the 63 composers featured on the Edexcel program, which covers a range of musical genres and eras.

The ABRSM, which holds more than 650,000 music exams across the world each year, has also been criticised for using language in questions that assumes composers are male.

Academic Dr Anna Bull tweeted: “The use of the default male pronouns by the ABRSM reflects the fact that their syllabi contain almost no women composers.

“Why do they think they can still get away with this?”

Penny Milsom, director of products and services at the ABRSM, told the Sunday Times: “We are committed to increasing gender diversity as part of our approach to refreshing our syllabuses and publications.

“We support other colleagues across the music industry working to increase the representation of women in music.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in