Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Examiners disagree on question of changing standards

Donald Macleod
Sunday 06 September 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IS IT becoming easier to pass GCSE or achieve a grade A? The examiners themselves disagree, writes Donald MacLeod.

Philip O'Hear, head of Acland Burghley School in London and a chief examiner for English at GCSE, said: 'I have no evidence that standards have fallen.'

Results were all in line with what candidates could be expected to achieve. GCSE, he said, had improved standards, and improved motivation of pupils.

'You can see the evidence in terms of the quality of work produced in the classroom. More students are producing better work,' he said. 'There may have been a loss of depth in some areas because of the wider syllabuses but I think on balance that there is both depth and width at all levels of ability.'

He said that when the exam boards had re-marked on the basis of comparing results with previous years, students had achieved higher standards with GCSE than they would have done with either O- level or the CSE. 'The pity is that criticism of the GCSE is being used to question the present structure and prepare the way for changes the Government has already decided upon, cutting down course work and making all the tests for the national curriculum very narrow and traditional.'

But Dr Philip Evans, headmaster of Bedford School, in Bedford, also an experienced chief examiner, said: 'Grades may be drifting upwards at GCSE and A- level despite the conscientious efforts of examiners. The human pressures on examiners not to fail a greater number of candidates than last year are reinforced by the commercial pressures on the boards to attract business.

'It's all being done with care by hard- working, diligent people - but it's drifting. Year by year the boundaries shift only slightly but the upshot is that over the course of a few years the pass rate has jumped markedly and A grades are easier to achieve.'

Exam boards were also under financial pressure to attract customers. 'A particular board is perceived to be 'tough' at its economic peril. This is an almost inevitable consequence of a free market examining economy,' he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in