Estate agent's deceit uncovered
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE only case of deliberate malpractice uncovered by the ombudsman last year involved an agent who led buyers to purchase his house rather than a customer's.
The agent knew the buyers intended to build a fourth bedroom on to the bungalow offered for sale by Mr A. They had also said they were nervous that Mrs A, who was living in the house following a separation, was not keen to sell. The agent immediately offered the buyers his own four-bedroom bungalow and withdrew the instruction to sell it from his office. Mr A's sale fell through.
The ombudsman ruled that the agent's first duty was to tell Mr A about the buyer's doubts. Second, he should not have offered his own property exclusively for obvious personal advantage. Third, his immediate disinstruction of his own office meant he had hoped to disguise what he had done. Mr A was awarded pounds 3,000.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments