Error 'robs schools of 69m pounds in grants'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SCHOOLS have been shortchanged by pounds 69m because the Government underestimated the number of pupils, a Labour MP claimed yesterday.
Stephen Byers, MP for Wallsend, said parliamentary answers showed schools had lost an amount equivalent to employing 3,480 newly qualified teachers because ministers underestimated pupil numbers in 1993-94 by more than 39,000.
They had underestimated primary pupil numbers by nearly 47,000 and overestimated secondary pupils by 7,400, Mr Byers said. The money schools receive is based on pupil numbers, and the overall loss was pounds 69.6m.
The estimates of pupil numbers are taken from internal government documents obtained by Mr Byers. He said: 'Our schools and our children should not be punished because the Government got their figures wrong.'
A Department for Education spokeswoman said projecting pupil numbers was not an exact science and the department believed the underestimate was more like 28,000.
Mr Byers said if that were the case schools had still missed out on about pounds 30m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments