English Heritage to shed over 100 sites
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ENGLISH HERITAGE is to announce plans to rid itself of more than 100 buildings and monuments, passing them on to councils, conservation charities, trusts and possibly private companies.
The move is part of a shake-up of the Government agency under its new chairman Jocelyn Stevens, appointed last year.
There are expected to be about 180 redundancies. Rumours have been circulating among worried staff about the contents of a document, Managing England's Heritage, a draft of which has been obtained by the Institution of Professionals, Managers and Specialists (IPMS), a civil service trade union.
English Heritage declined to comment, saying the contents were strictly confidential until publication on Monday.
The organisation owns or manages nearly 400 buildings and sites, including Stonehenge, castles, abbeys, and Roman ruins. It is to concentrate 'human and financial' resources on about two-thirds of these, 'the high ground . . . instead of spreading them dangerously thinly', says the draft. Its 400-strong labour force, much of it craftsmen, is to be privatised.
The IPMS said: 'We're quite outraged, not only because of the job losses for our members but because of the importance to the public heritage.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments