Engineer's seven years of misery for telling truth: The American Association for the Advancement of Science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.First Edition
AN ENGINEER who spoke out over technical problems with the space shuttle Challenger said it had taken him seven years to recover from the ill effects his 'whistle-blowing' caused him.
Roger Boisjoly warned delegates of the personal and professional risks 'truth-tellers' take.
Speaking at a session on ethics in science, Mr Boisjoly said his life changed radically the instant he testified to the Presidential Commission set up to examine the Challenger disaster. Mr Boisjoly was an engineer at Morton Thiokol, the contractor for the solid rocket fuel booster whose failed O-ring joint led, in part, to the shuttle disaster.
He told the meeting that his life was made a misery. At work colleagues spurned him and he was kept away from important projects. He also suffered classic symptoms of post-traumatic stress syndrome, including a serious heart condition, double vision, anxiety and depression. He was not able to work for five years, but now runs his own engineering consultancy and acts as an expert witness on technical issues in court.
Robert Sprague, another speaker at the conference, said he too had suffered since blowing the whistle on a colleague.
The colleague, Stephen Breuning, was later found guilty of scientific misconduct after dosing mentally ill patients with psychoactive drugs. 'I have been trailed at conferences, and my speeches 'corrected'. I have had research grants refused time and time again,' he said.
Mr Boisjoly advised potential whistle-blowers to think carefully before going ahead: 'You must be aware that you will have to pay a very high price,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments