Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Drink firms criticised over adverts

Tuesday 19 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

TWO drinks companies have been criticised for their sexually explicit advertisements.

In the first case, the Advertising Standards Authority said the Bulmer cider firm was wrong to feature a photograph of a young couple embracing to advertise the Spanish beer, San Miguel.

The man's hand was on the woman's bottom along with the slogan 'Consumed with passion'.

The ASA, which upheld complaints about the advert, said that it 'could imply that consumption of the product led to success in the relationship'.

The company said the advert would not be used again.

In the second case the ASA received 10 complaints about a poster for Autumn Gold Cider that featured the torsos of a man and woman with large fig leaves covering their genitals.

The Taunton Cider Company said the poster was designed to be humorous, but the ASA said its 'reliance on sexual innuendo had undoubtedly offended the complainants'.

It was contrary to guidelines in the Code of Advertising Practice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in