Doubts cast over figures for surplus places
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GOVERNMENT efforts to force local authorities to cut surplus school places may have been based on inaccurate figures, senior education officials believe, writes Fran Abrams.
The Department for Education launched a drive to eliminate spare capacity in June this year, based on an estimate from 1991 that schools have 1.3 million empty desks.
However, the head of the new Funding Authority for Schools, Sir Christopher Benson, said this week that the real number could be much lower. In the 47 areas where the authority has a role - about half the authorities in Britain - there were just 200,000 spare secondary school places, he said.
The surplus was equivalent to 14 per cent of the total number of places, he said, but an increase in the birth-rate was about to boost the number of pupils moving to secondary schools.
By the end of the century just 7 per cent of places are expected to be unoccupied. This figure is thought to be an adequate level to allow for flexibility and parental choice.
Sir Christopher said: 'Over the past few years, various figures have been bandied about, generally suggesting that there are a million or upwards surplus places in the system. The agency's tentative conclusion is that . . . it may be less of an issue than has previously been thought.'
He added that in up to one third of the areas in which the FAS operates - where more than 10 per cent of pupils are in opted-out schools - there would be a need for more school places before 2,000. In Hillingdon and Sutton, in outer London, plans for an expansion of the secondary school places are under way.
In some areas there is still a major surplus which must be addressed. Warwickshire has 16,000 spare places amounting to between 15 and 19 per cent of the total, which it hopes to reduce by one third through its current reorganisation. Others have already carried out reorganisations to reduce their spare capacity. Humberside completed a major exercise a year ago, and Surrey has also made changes in its primary schools.
Wherever such proposals are put forward, an extra dimension is now added by the possibility of schools opting out to avoid closure and thereby disrupting their local authorities' plans. In an increasing number of cases, both local authority plans and applications for grant maintained status will arrive simultaneously on the desk of Gillian Shephard, Secretary of State for Education, for a final decision on the way forward.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments