Doubt is cast over hospital's future
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE FUTURE of Charing Cross teaching hospital in London was thrown into jeopardy yesterday when its regional health authority proposed closing its casualty department, writes Jack O'Sullivan.
In effect, the 100-page report puts the Charing Cross alongside St Thomas's and University College hospitals at the top of the danger list for closures being put forward by regional authorities to the Government's advisers.
North West Thames regional health authority has recommended closing up to 1,964 of the region's 7,000 beds by 1996. Additionally, medical schools at St Mary's, Westminster and Charing Cross would be streamlined into a single school based around Imperial College. These plans go forward to an inquiry which will make recommendations on London health care to the Government next month. It is widely expected to propose closing at least two London teaching hospitals.
The health authority's submission paints a gloomy picture of Charing Cross, said to be 'threatened by the internal market'. Its plan would involve closure of the Charing Cross casualty department by April 1994.
The Charing Cross site might instead be used for elderly and mentally ill people and as a focus of primary care services.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments