Double edge to education answers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LOCAL authorities will be delighted to broadcast some of the information that the Audit Commission is seeking. But they believe that some of the questions relate to central government pressures rather than their own efficiency, writes Donald MacLeod.
Councils agree, for instance, that the speed with which student grants are paid is a fair performance indicator. But the number and value of discretionary awards paid out by any authority is closely linked to its financial position. Warwickshire, for example, which has been charge-capped for two years running, is unable to offer more than a handful of discretionary grants to anyone other than students with special educational needs; its education budget has to be spent on its statutory obligations to schools.
Urban (mainly Labour-run) authorities, which spend more on nursery education, will be eager to supply figures on under-fives in the system. They have long resented the fact that the Government's nursery funding is based on population rather than the numbers actually being taught. Education authorities with generous nursery provision are penalised.
On school meals, the commission has ducked the politically embarrassing question of free meals - the recent increase is a sure sign of the recession - in favour of an odd formulation: 'Percent of LEA school pupils who have the choice of eating a hot, cooked meal on school premises at lunchtime.'
The commission admits it would be preferable to measure nutritional content. The Government, however, refuses to bring in nutritional standards that would permit this. The indicator also shies away from the take-up of meals which has also been falling because of price increases. School catering is becoming increasingly privatised and the responsibility of individual schools.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments