Raab refuses to commit to remaining in human rights convention ‘forever’
There is a split within the Cabinet over the UK’s continued membership of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK’s continued participation in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) will depend on the actions of Strasbourg judges, Dominic Raab suggested.
The Justice Secretary insisted the Government’s current position was to remain within the convention, but he said he was not able to guarantee that “forever and a day”.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman has stated that her personal view is to withdraw from the convention, which has been blamed for frustrating efforts to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.
On Monday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told MPs: “The UK is and will remain a member of the ECHR.”
We feel more not less committed to the Council of Europe as a result of Brexit. I think we've shown our European credentials in relation to Ukraine, what we do in Nato
But at a Lords committee on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Mr Raab said that while the Government’s position was to “stay a state party” to the convention, he did not rule out a change.
“If you’re asking me whether we are committed, forever and a day, to staying in the ECHR, the answer is that’s not a commitment that we’re able to make. And that depends a little bit on the court.”
The ECHR is a Council of Europe convention and pulling out of it would put the UK at odds with the vast majority of countries in the continent.
Mr Raab said he was “frustrated” that there is “any suggestion of moral equivalence” with countries such as Russia by being in a dispute over the ECHR.
But Mr Raab told the Lords Constitution Committee: “We feel more not less committed to the Council of Europe as a result of Brexit. I think we’ve shown our European credentials in relation to Ukraine, what we do in Nato.
“It’s not a question of rejecting Europe. In fact, I actually see the Council of Europe as an opportunity, not just in terms of the court, but some of the other work they do – for example, raising fair trial standards – a good opportunity to show we can be an even stronger European neighbour.”
Ms Braverman has previously stated that her personal position is “ultimately we do need to leave the European Convention on Human Rights”, even though that is not government policy.
In response, Mr Raab told peers: “A fundamental principle of the ECHR and a quintessentially British right is to express yourself freely.”
Downing Street has insisted there are “no plans” to withdraw from the ECHR, following speculation the Prime Minister could do so if his small boats crackdown faces legal opposition.
The Government is expected to set out further plans for new laws to tackle the problem of migrants crossing the English Channel.