Doctors brought down to earth
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NOT ONLY are doctors no longer seen as God, they can no longer call themselves God, the General Medical Council's standards committee has decided, writes Nicholas Timmins.
In what may mark the final demise of the long-standing deification of the medical profession, the full council will today be asked to approve new guidance telling doctors it is wrong for them to use their professional position 'to express personal beliefs in ways which may cause distress or which exploit patients' vulnerability'.
The move follows cases drawn to the GMC's attention in which doctors have used their professional position to proselytise patients, or 'offer diagnoses based on spiritual, rather than on medical grounds'.
Dr Donald Irvine, the committee's chairman, said it had received three complaints in 1993 about doctors who had informed patients that they would not recover 'until they gave their lives to God'. One patient complained that following her child's death a GP told her she was 'evil' and that 'the devil had taken her baby'.
While it is clearly the doctor as spiritualist, faith-healer or over-enthusiastic evangelist that the GMC has in its sights, the new guidance will also relate to any personal or political view.
It would not be approriate to prevent doctors from expressing such views, but they should not do so to the point where they cause distress to patients. 'It will always be a matter of judgement where you draw the line,' Dr Irvine said. But his committee was worried if doctors started saying 'I am not going to care for you unless you sign up to certain beliefs or views I have'.
Sir Robert Kilpatrick, president of the GMC, also acknowledged there could be some difficult judgements involved. He had received a complaint from MPs over notices some GPs had displayed stating that 'This government is damaging your health'. Some patients would indeed find that rude, he said, but equally 'a large number of patients' would not.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments