Docklands move for civil servants in doubt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CIVIL servants from the Department of the Environment look increasingly unlikely to move to the London Docklands, threatening the Jubilee Line extension and further damaging prospects for the Canary Wharf development.
Jack Straw, Labour's environment spokesman, claimed yesterday that Michael Howard, the Secretary of State for the Environment, had told the Prime Minister that a move to Docklands was no longer the bargain it seemed.
Falling rents elsewhere in Docklands have made Canary Wharf less attractive and ministers are comparing rents with the millions of square feet of empty office space around Westminster.
DoE sources are talking of the department moving out of Marsham Street during this Parliament. Meanwhile, the Treasury, which wants the Jubilee Line extension scrapped, is thought to be arguing that the pounds 180m being offered towards the line by the bankers running Canary Wharf, on condition civil servants move there, is a hidden subsidy.
With the Public Accounts Committee certain to investigate any move in detail, environment department sources say Mr Howard is determined to be able to demonstrate that the decision represents value for money.
Mr Straw said yesterday: 'I understand that a personal minute sent recently by Mr Howard to the Prime Minister poses grave doubts on the earlier claim that a move to Docklands would be a bargain for the taxpayer. I am asking Mr Howard to confirm that the latest figures show the cost to the taxpayer would be between pounds 130m and pounds 200m.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments