Lammy raises human rights concerns in ‘constructive’ talks with China
Both sides stressed the need for ‘pragmatic’ engagement during the Foreign Secretary’s visit to Beijing.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Lammy pressed his Chinese counterpart on human rights concerns and Beijing’s support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine during talks in Beijing, the Foreign Office has said.
The Foreign Secretary had been under pressure to take a tough line on a range of human rights issues with foreign minister Wang Yi when the pair met on Friday during Mr Lammy’s first visit to China since taking office.
In a statement issued after the meeting, the Foreign Office described the encounter as “constructive”, noting Mr Lammy raised “a number of foreign policy and security matters” including Chinese companies supplying equipment to the Russian military and the ongoing situation in the Middle East.
It added that human rights “were discussed”, including relating to alleged mistreatment of Uighurs in Xinjiang, in China’s far west, and the ongoing detention of British national Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong.
But the statement made no direct reference to Taiwan. Earlier in the week, China held large-scale military exercises surrounding the island which Sir Keir Starmer described as “not conducive to peace and stability”.
Speaking before travelling to China, Mr Lammy had said it was important to speak “candidly” about “both areas of contention as well as areas for cooperation in the UK’s national interest”.
But the Government has distanced itself from comments Mr Lammy made while in opposition in which he suggested actions against the mainly Muslim Uighur group should be declared a genocide.
A Downing Street spokeswoman said on Thursday that such decisions were for “competent courts”, adding: “We stand firm on human rights and we’ve been very clear that China continues to persecute and arbitrarily detain the Uighurs and other predominantly Muslim minorities.”
Along with human rights and security concerns, the statement said Mr Lammy raised a number of areas for “pragmatic, mutually beneficial co-operation” with Beijing.
These included the transition to green energy, international development, global health, the safe use of AI and promoting “secure and resilient growth” through trade and investment.
During his visit to Beijing, Mr Lammy also met with Ding Xuexiang, the most senior of China’s vice-premiers and a close associate of President Xi Jinping.
According to a statement by the Chinese government, Mr Ding said China was “ready to work with the UK” to create “a more stable and mutually beneficial” relationship, and also stressed the need for “pragmatic co-operation”.
Mr Lammy is now expected to travel to Shanghai to hold talks with British businesses on economic links between the UK and China.
His visit is the second by a British foreign secretary in two years, following a trip by James Cleverly in August 2023. That visit marked a slight thaw in UK-Chinese relations, with Mr Cleverly becoming the first foreign secretary to visit the country since 2018.
He too had stressed the need for a “pragmatic” relationship with Beijing, but also raised concerns about human rights in Hong Kong and Xinjiang