Blair was warned on peril of repealing same-sex education law ahead of election
David Blunkett wrote to Tony Blair about ditching the controversial Section 28.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair was warned about the Labour government’s commitment to scrapping the infamous law banning the “promotion” of homosexuality in schools in the run-up to the 2001 general election, records show.
David Blunkett, then the education secretary, twice wrote to the prime minister to voice his concerns regarding the furore over Section 28.
It followed months of debate over potential changes to same-sex education in schools.
In one letter to Mr Blair, in December 1999, a concerned Mr Blunkett wrote: “We appear to be in real danger of getting on the wrong side of the argument in relation to the family.
“Whatever we do, we must be clear that there can be no proselytising of any form of sexuality in schools or youth services.
“I am very worried that the people I know and care about, who are on the margins of politics and who are classic voters in their 40s and 50s, are a little bit confused about what messages we are putting out.”
Mr Blunkett said he was personally in favour of abolishing Section 28.
Three months later, he reiterated his “deep concern” about the issue “running through to and beyond the general election”.
He wrote: “It seems to me that anything that ‘defers’ the issue to a future date will end up with the general election featuring the promotion of homosexuality alongside anti-European fervour and the re-emergence of English nationalism! Not a very happy cocktail.
“It seems to me that there are a vast swathe of very reasonable people (certainly outside the London chattering classes) who are deeply concerned as to why it is that we are not prepared to ‘rule out the promotion of homosexuality’ in our schools.
“The fact that Section 28 doesn’t do this is, to the uninitiated, a sideshow. So long as they believe that it does, then the issue is a running sore.”
Mr Blunkett suggested replacing Section 28 with a “form of words” which would state that no teacher would promote any sexuality or sexual orientation.
The Queen’s Speech later that year, setting out the Government’s forthcoming legislative programme, did not include a commitment to reintroduce a repeal of Section 28 following its rejection by the House of Lords in the last session.
It reinforced the impression that ministers were anxious to avoid getting bogged down in a contentious issue, likely to attract hostile press headlines, in the run-up to polling day, as identified by Mr Blunkett.
Labour went on to win the next general election, held in 2001, in which Mr Blunkett was promoted to Home Secretary.
Section 28 was repealed in England and Wales in 2003, following Scotland, which scrapped it in 2000.
The correspondence formed part of the latest release by the National Archives in Kew.