Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Customs accused over computers: National Audit Office shelved value-for-money report into planned system which has cost pounds 82m. Tim Kelsey reports

Tim Kelsey
Friday 11 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CUSTOMS and Excise is accused of being 'economical with the truth' over a proposed computer project which has cost pounds 82m and which some users insist is so flawed it should be scrapped.

It has also emerged that the National Audit Office shelved a value-for-money report into the project last year. It has denied doing so because political pressure was applied.

When first asked by the Independent earlier this week, a NAO spokeswoman denied that there had been any plans for a study. But she admitted yesterday, after documents had been obtained showing the contrary, that such plans had existed.

Letters were sent to users of the computer announcing plans for a study to establish 'whether the project has been delivered to time and cost'.

The spokeswoman said that the NAO did not decide to mount a formal inquiry because it was satisfied that the system, which has gone over-budget by pounds 12m and been postponed several times, represented value for money. She denied that there was any political pressure.

This view contrasts sharply with that taken by many of those who will be using the computer, called Chief, which monitors imports and exports. The British International Freight Association (BIFA) has written to Customs, in a letter leaked to the Independent yesterday, demanding that plans to implement Chief in March are halted. BIFA wants the system to be subject to an independent audit.

The letter discloses major operating problems with the system, which was built by British Telecom. On one recent occasion, the computer developed a fault and had to be withdrawn from trials. BIFA, which represents 1,000 freight forwarders, described Customs' claims that the system had been tested successfully earlier this month as 'erroneous'. The letter also accuses Customs of being 'economical with the truth' in publicly stating that most of Chief's users 'were happy with its performance'.

A copy of the letter has been sent to the Paymaster-General, Sir John Cope, who has responsibility for the Customs and Excise.

One director of BIFA said yesterday: 'I believe Chief should be killed off. Even Customs officers we have talked to think it is a disaster.'

If Chief was scrapped, it would heap further embarrassment on the Government's record for incompetence in public sector computer projects. The collapse of the computer system at Wessex Regional Health Authority, which drew much criticism from the House of Common's Public Accounts Committee, wasted only pounds 63m of taxpayer's money. Chief would set a new precedent.

Accounting problems caused by a computer fault led to pounds 44.5m in Social Fund loans being under-estimated by the Benefits Agency, according to a report to Parliament published yesterday.

The National Audit Office, the taxpayers' watchdog, has decided to 'qualify' its audit opinion - which means it refuses to endorse the Social Fund Account for 1992- 93 - because of the 'material uncertainty remaining about the accuracy of the 'loans outstanding' figure at 31 March 1993'.

The NAO Comptroller and Auditor General, Sir John Bourn, said in his report that the difference between outstanding loans shown in the Social Fund account and the figure from its computer system, which contained details of individual loans, was due mainly to faults in the computer programme. 'They estimate that the programme was understating the total amount of loans actually held on the computer system by pounds 44.5m,' he said.

However, the report said there was no evidence that these faults had affected the records of amounts owed by individuals or had resulted in a cash loss.

The Commons Public Accounts Committee is expected to consider the NAO's report on 28 February. A new Social Fund computer system is expected to be running by May.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in