Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cross-country water transfer plans rejected: Putting showers in all new homes is proposed as one measure to beat drought. Nicholas Schoon reports

Nicholas Schoon
Thursday 30 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GRANDIOSE schemes for beating water shortages by transferring water from the North and West of Britain to the parched South and East have been rejected by Michael Howard, Secretary of State for the Environment.

The answer, he believes, lies in making people use less water. Yesterday, he launched a consultation paper which sets out government suggestions for controlling demand, now rising by 1 per cent a year. Ideas include making showers a compulsory feature of new houses, tougher water conservation standards for washing machines and toilet cisterns, and widespread water metering.

The drought has eased slightly because England and Wales have had more than a third above the average July rainfall. East Anglia, one of the driest regions, had 122 per cent of average June rainfall and by yesterday it had had 157 per cent of the July average.

The summer rain has reduced demand but done nothing to recharge ground water levels - now at record lows - in the chalk aquifers which supply much of the South and the East. Hosepipe bans still cover 6.75 million people from east Devon to Humberside, and parts of the Home Counties have tougher drought orders banning all non-essential use of water.

The National Rivers Authority and the British Waterways Board have proposed that canals and rivers could be used to transfer water across the country. This month, the Scottish Office minister for industry, Alan Stewart, said he was interested in Scotland selling surplus water to southern England. But yesterday, Mr Howard said that apart from being extremely costly, such schemes could be environmentally destructive. Fresh water from Wales and Scotland is more acidic and chemically different from the water in the chalk rivers of eastern and southern England. It could damage their wildlife if it entered these streams in bulk. Huge new reservoirs, which several water companies are seeking to build, eliminated familiar landscapes and their flora and fauna.

'Increasing demand for water is an inevitable result of rising living standards. We have to look at moderating some of the demand,' Mr Howard said.

Four dry years combined with heavy use of ground water have left miles of dry riverbed in the South and East. But Mr Howard did not think water consumption could be cut: only that the rate of increase could be slowed.

Suggestions include reviving the practice of water company staff visiting households to check for leaks and replacing worn tap washers free of charge; introducing water meters first of all for households with swimming pools, ponds or hoses; and setting mandatory targets for water companies to reduce mains leakage. About a quarter of Britain's tap water is lost between the treatment plant and final home use.

Efforts should also be made to persuade water companies to recycle water, and to charge them for the amount they take from rivers and boreholes. At present, they pay a flat fee for a licence.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in