Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Critics attack 'tinkering' on child support

Nicholas Timmins,Political Correspondent
Monday 01 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE FIRST minor government concession over the operation of the Child Support Agency yesterday brought complaints from pressure groups and opposition MPs that the change did nothing to address key concerns over the controversial scheme, writes Nicholas Timmins.

Alistair Burt, Parliamentary Secretary for Social Security, announced yesterday that the agency, which assesses maintenance payments, would consider mothers on income support in the light of their circumstances rather than merely working through them in order over three years.

This could mean earlier help for families who would come off benefit if the absent father paid up. But it was attacked as 'half-hearted tinkering' with the system by Donald Dewar, Labour's social security spokesman, after bitter complaints that the agency has concentrated on absent fathers who already pay some maintenance rather than seeking out those who pay none, and that it is using a rigid formula that is upsetting deals between divorced and separated parents.

The change 'does not strike at the injustices which are undermining confidence in the CSA,' he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in