Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tommy Robinson due in court over contempt claims

Robinson, 41, is accused of being in contempt of court after the airing of a film at a protest in Trafalgar Square in July.

Sam Hall
Sunday 27 October 2024 22:45 EDT
Political activist Tommy Robinson outside Folkestone police station (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
Political activist Tommy Robinson outside Folkestone police station (Jordan Pettitt/PA) (PA Wire)

Tommy Robinson is due to appear at Woolwich Crown Court on Monday for a hearing over contempt of court claims.

The two-day hearing concerns allegations that he breached a 2021 High Court order barring him from repeating libellous allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him.

The 41-year-old, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is accused of being in contempt of court after the airing of a film at a protest in Trafalgar Square in July.

Robinson attended Folkestone police station on Friday where he was remanded into custody and separately charged with failing to provide his mobile phone access code to police under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

On Saturday, thousands of his supporters gathered in central London for a protest which the political activist missed after he was remanded.

Demonstrators carried placards reading ā€œTwo tier Keir fuelled the riotsā€ and chanted ā€œWe want Tommy outā€ as they headed from Victoria station to Parliament Square.

Robinson was released on unconditional bail in July and subsequently left the country, with Adam Payter, representing the Solicitor General, telling the High Court there ā€œwas nothing to prevent him from doing soā€.

Mr Justice Johnson issued a warrant for Robinsonā€™s arrest but ordered that it not be carried out ā€œuntil early Octoberā€ to allow Robinson time to indicate that he would attend the next hearing voluntarily or to apply to ā€œset asideā€ the warrant.

Robinson posted a video of himself arriving at Luton Airport on October 20 and said he was surprised he had not been arrested.

He applied to set aside the warrant but his application was dismissed by Mr Justice Johnson on Friday.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in