Supreme Court to rule on Government Rwanda policy bid next week
Five justices at the UK’s highest court will give their decision on whether the plans are lawful on Wednesday.
For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
The Supreme Court is to give its decision on whether Government plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda are lawful next week.
Last month, the Home Office challenged a Court of Appeal ruling from June that the multimillion-pound deal – which would see asylum seekers deported to the east African nation – was unlawful.
Five justices at the UK’s highest court are now to give their decision on the challenge on Wednesday.
The Illegal Migration Act brought into law the Government’s policy of sending some asylum seekers to Rwanda.
However, the policy announced in April 2022 has been held up in the courts, with no deportation flights having taken place.
Speaking to Sky News during a visit to the island of Samos in the Aegean Sea on November 4, Home Secretary Suella Braverman said it was “impossible to give a specific timeline” on when deportation flights could take off should judges give the Rwanda plan the green light.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has set stopping small boats of asylum seekers from arriving in Britain as one of his five pledges to the electorate.
But since the year started, almost 26,700 migrants have arrived via the English Channel, according to UK Government figures from earlier this month.
During the three-day Supreme Court hearing, Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said the policy to remove people to “a country less attractive” than the UK, “but nevertheless safe”, is lawful.
The Government has previously argued that a memorandum of understanding agreed between the two countries provides assurances that ensure everyone sent there will have a “safe and effective” refugee status determination procedure.
However, Raza Husain KC, for several of the asylum seekers at risk of deportation to Rwanda, later described the country’s asylum system as “woefully deficient… marked by acute unfairness and arbitrariness”.
The UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, intervened in the Supreme Court hearing, with its barrister Angus McCullough KC telling the court the assurances were “no sufficient answer” to “basic and fundamental defects” in the Rwandan system.
The ruling by Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Sales will be handed down on Wednesday after 10am.