Woman ‘regrets’ giving blank cheques to accused ex-MP, court told
But former MSP Carolyn Leckie told Glasgow Sheriff Court trial she had ‘completely trusted’ Natalie McGarry, who is charged with embezzlement.
For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
A former MSP has said she regrets giving blank cheques to an ex-SNP MP accused of embezzling thousands from a pro-Scottish independence group.
Carolyn Leckie was speaking at the trial of Natalie McGarry, 40, who is accused of misappropriating more than £25,000 from two campaign groups, including Women For Independence (WFI).
McGarry, who was the MP for Glasgow East between 2015 and 2017, is on trial at Glasgow Sheriff Court charged with embezzling £21,000 between April 26, 2013 and November 30, 2015 while she was treasurer of the organisation.
It is also alleged she cashed cheques held in the name of WFI while managing the group’s finances and transferred money made from fundraising events into her personal accounts.
With hindsight I regret giving her blank cheques, but I had no reason to believe that she wasn't using them for WFI
A second charge accuses her of embezzling £4,661.02 from the Glasgow Regional Association of the SNP between April 9, 2014 and August 10, 2015.
McGarry denies both charges.
Ms Leckie, a former Scottish Socialist Party MSP and one of the founding members of WFI in 2012, was called to give evidence at the trial on Friday.
The 57-year-old confirmed she was a signatory for the group’s accounts and gave McGarry signed blank cheques with the understanding she would transfer donated money for WFI resources, including merchandise.
The court was shown multiple cheques that had been addressed to McGarry and signed by Ms Leckie.
They included sums of £900, £934, £700, £665 and £358 and were dated between December 2014 and April 2015, and were cashed to McGarry, the court heard.
Ms Leckie confirmed her signature on the cheques shown, but when asked if she filled them out she replied: “That’s not my writing.”
She told the court: “With hindsight I regret giving her (McGarry) blank cheques, but I had no reason to believe that she wasn’t using them for WFI.
“I wish I had been far more careful or more suspicious, but I wasn’t.
“I completely trusted Natalie.
“I thought she was competent and coping and it was a relief for me because I had a lot going on at the time.”
Ms Leckie told the court that she and McGarry had become “good friends” when working together at WFI.
She said even in the days before some of the group’s members reported McGarry to Police Scotland over concerns about WFI finances, “I still had a soft spot for Natalie”.
She told the court: “I asked her, ‘have you spent any WFI money on your own expenses?’ And she said no.
“I felt like a fool. But she assured me she hadn’t.”
Ms Leckie went on to say she believed McGarry “engineered” their relationship “so that I would give her blank cheques”.
Earlier, the court heard former Scottish health secretary Jeane Freeman, who was also a co-founder of WFI, give evidence.
The ex-SNP MSP for Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley admitted to “losing patience” and getting “pissed off” with McGarry’s communication over the group’s accounts.
When prosecutor Alastair Mitchell asked Ms Leckie if she anticipated issues with McGarry’s role as treasurer, she replied: “There were no alarm bells ringing for me probably not until the time the accounts were being requested by the committee and when Jeane (Freeman) was raising alarm bells.”
Allan Macleod, defending, read out a statement from Ms Leckie in which she described McGarry as a “human dynamo”.
Ms Leckie nodded her head in court, adding: “My impression was that she was really competent.”
Ms Leckie told the court earlier that McGarry was the main person in charge of the finance side of the organisation.
She claimed the organisation’s bank statements, which arrived at her home in East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, were given to McGarry.
She told the court she became busier with her job and studying for her law degree at the time.
Mr MacLeod asked the witness if she thought the finance admin of WFI was “chaotic” and “impractical”, to which she replied: “It was certainly chaotic.
“It was after the referendum that it started to become a lot more chaotic.”
The trial, before Sheriff Tom Hughes, continues.