Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mother who stamped daughter to death appeals conviction because her lawyer was interrupted by judge

21-month-old Ayeeshia Jane Smith suffered months of abuse was described by investigators as suffering the sort of injuries one would sustain a car crash

Alexandra Sims
Thursday 01 December 2016 03:12 EST
Kathryn Smith, 23, outside Birmingham Crown Court
Kathryn Smith, 23, outside Birmingham Crown Court (PA)

A mother who was jailed for life after stamping to death her 21-month-old daughter has launched an appeal against her conviction.

Kathryn Smith was convicted of child cruelty and handed a minimum term of 24 years in April following a majority verdict at Birmingham Crown Court.

The 23-year-old's daughter Ayeeshia Jane Smith suffered months of abuse was described by investigators as suffering the sort of injuries one would sustain a car crash.

Her ex-partner, 22-year-old Matthew Rigby, was jailed for three years and six months for causing or allowing Ayeeshia Jane's death at the family home in Burton-upon-Trent in Staffordshire.

The little girl was known to Derbyshire social services from birth and had been in care for a brief period from mid-2013, before she was returned to her mother's custody.

Smith challenged her conviction at the Court of Appeal on Wednesday, where her barrister argued it was "unsafe".

John Butterfield QC, who also represented Smith at trial, said an interruption by the trial judge during his closing speech in Smith's defence caused "prejudice" in the minds of the jurors, the Derby Telegraph reports.

Photo issued by Staffordshire Police of Ayeeshia Jane Smith before her death showing marks to her face and the underside of her chin
Photo issued by Staffordshire Police of Ayeeshia Jane Smith before her death showing marks to her face and the underside of her chin (PA)

He said: "The judge weighed in and weighed in in a way that was wrong, I say, on a number of different levels, in the middle of defence counsel's closing address.

"To trespass on the closing remarks at all was a risk and was likely to have consequences.

"But to trespass on them to the extent and degree that was done here was dramatic and it cannot be said that the conviction is safe, I'm afraid, because of these matters."

Christopher Hotten QC, who prosecuted Smith, denied that the judge's interruption caused the conviction to be unsafe, the Stoke Sentinel reports.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, sitting with Mr Justice Wyn Williams and Mr Justice Goss, are expected to give a ruling in the New Year, the Mail Online reports.

If Smith's conviction appeal is unsuccessful, Lord Thomas said the minimum jail term handed to Smith would be reviewed.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in