Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ministers challenge tribunal ruling over ex Irish soldier who joined IS

Lisa Smith was made subject of a Home Office-issued exclusion order.

Tom Pilgrim
Tuesday 21 February 2023 12:47 EST
Former Irish soldier Lisa Smith (Niall Carson/PA)
Former Irish soldier Lisa Smith (Niall Carson/PA) (PA Archive)

The Government is bringing a Court of Appeal challenge against a tribunalā€™s conclusion that a UK entry ban could not be imposed on an Irish former soldier convicted of membership of the so-called Islamic State (IS) terror group.

Lisa Smith, 41, an ex-Defence Forces member, was found guilty in May last year of IS membership but cleared of a separate charge of financing terrorism after a nine-week trial at Dublinā€™s Special Criminal Court.

Before her conviction, Smith was made subject of a Home Office-issued exclusion order, preventing her from entering the UK, from December 2019 on the grounds of public security.

However, Smith successfully appealed against the order at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), which concluded in May last year that the enforcement action in her case would be ā€œincapable of justificationā€.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman is now appealing against the SIAC decision, arguing it was wrong to decide Smith had ā€œimmunityā€ from exclusion.

Smith, a convert to Islam, went to Syria in 2015 after terrorist leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi called on Muslims to travel there.

The former soldier was handed a 15-month sentence in July.

Smithā€™s father is originally from Belfast and her dispute with the Home Office centres on whether she is entitled to enter the UK as a result.

The UK has a legal right to exclude non-British citizens from EEA (European Economic Area) countries, including Ireland, but that does not cover those of dual nationality.

Smith was born in Ireland, but due to her parents being unmarried at the time, missed out on automatic British citizenship.

Her lawyers argue she is not responsible for this ā€œaccident of birthā€ and is entitled to be treated as a British citizen under the European Convention on Human Rights.

At a hearing in London on Tuesday, Cathryn McGahey KC, representing the Home Secretary, said: ā€œThe Secretary of Stateā€™s case is: You are a non-citizen.

ā€œWe wish to exclude you because you pose a danger to national security and we can do that because you are a foreign national.

ā€œWe accept that you have the right to apply to be a British national.

ā€œIf you do that, the Secretary of State can then decide whether to deprive you of the citizenship and exclude you.ā€

Ms McGahey told the court that Smith was a ā€œmono-Irish nationalā€ and claimed she does not want to be a British national nor dual Irish-British citizen.

Smith, from Co Louth, previously said she identifies as Irish and believes she is ā€œentitled to be treated as British by virtue of my birth rightsā€, the court was told in her legal teamā€™s written submissions.

Ms McGahey said what Smith seeks is ā€œthe status of someone entitled to be treated as if she were a British citizen ā€¦ for the limited purpose only of the UKā€™s exclusion lawsā€, arguing that British nationality is an ā€œindivisible package of rights and obligationsā€.

ā€œIt is not possible as a matter of law for somebody to be treated as though they were British purely to avoid exclusion but to be a foreign national for all other purposes,ā€ she added.

The barrister argued that Smith ā€œseeks a right that ā€¦ is available only to a British citizen not to a class of persons entitled to be treated as though they were British citizensā€.

In written arguments, Hugh Southey KC, representing Smith, said the Home Officeā€™s appeal should be dismissed and the SIAC decision ā€œcontains no error of lawā€.

He argued there was ā€œno justification for the stark differential and less favourable treatmentā€ of Smith ā€œbased solely on an accident of birth for which she is not responsibleā€.

ā€œMs Smith lives close to the Irish border with the United Kingdom. As a consequence, her ability to move across the border is part of her social identity,ā€ he added.

Mr Southey argued it was discriminatory to require Smith to apply for British nationality and take an oath of allegiance because it was ā€œnot consistent with her right to self-identify as Irish, a right safeguarded by the Good Friday agreementā€.

Lord Justice Underhill, Lord Justice Lewis and Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing will give their ruling on the case at a later date.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in