Former Spanish king wins appeal but court fight with ex-lover will continue
Danish businesswoman Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, 57, has sued Juan Carlos, 84, who abdicated in 2014, and wants damages for personal injury.

A former king of Spain has won the latest stage of a London court battle with an ex-lover ā but a lawyer says the fight will go on.
Danish businesswoman Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, 57, has sued Juan Carlos, 84, who abdicated in 2014, and wants damages for personal injury.
She alleges he caused her āgreat mental painā by spying on and harassing her.
Juan Carlos denies wrongdoing and disputes the claims made against him.
A High Court judge ruled earlier this year the claims could be considered at a trial in England.
But Juan Carlos on Tuesday won an appeal after challenging some of Mr Justice Nicklinās conclusions on jurisdiction.
Appeal judges Lady Justice King, Lady Justice Simler and Lord Justice Popplewell, who heard arguments at a recent Court of Appeal hearing, concluded āthe pre-abdication conduct alleged is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of this countryā.
However, a lawyer for Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn said the appeal court ruling will not affect claims she made about Juan Carlosās behaviour after his abdication.
Michael Kim, from law firm Kobre & Kim, said the āoverwhelming partā of the claim āshould proceed to trialā.
āThe judgment applies to a very narrow issue,ā he said.
āIt concerns only the period when Juan Carlos was the reigning king of Spain.
āThe overwhelming part of Corinnaās claim, from 2014, remains unaffected and should proceed to trial.ā
The judgment applies to a very narrow issue
Judges have been told Juan Carlos ruled from 1975 until his abdication in 2014 and the succession of his son, King Felipe VI.
They have heard Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn is Danish, lived in Monaco between 2008 and 2019, and has homes in London and Shropshire.
Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn wants an āinjunction and damagesā resulting from āa continuous and ongoing campaign of harassmentā against her, ācommencedā by (Juan Carlos) from 2012, following the ābreak-up of an intimate romantic relationshipā and her ārefusal to let (Juan Carlos) use a financial sum irrevocably gifted to her, or to return other giftsā, the judges were told.
Lawyers representing her have alleged to judges that conduct āincludes (the former king) or his agents smearing her and her business in the media, following her, entering her home in Shropshire and bugging her homes and electronic devicesā.
Timothy Otty KC, who is leading Juan Carlosās legal team, told appeal judges in a written argument the former king considers Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Saynās legal action to be āvexatiousā.
A spokeswoman for Juan Carlos said in a statement: āIn its judgment, the Court of Appeal emphasised that His Majesty āemphatically denies that he engaged in, or directed, any harassment of (the claimant) and rejects her allegationsā¦ as untrueā.
I emphasise at this stage that there has, as yet, been no decision about whether any of the allegations she makes are true
āIn upholding His Majestyās appeal, the Court of Appeal ruled that, regardless of that denial, on a proper application of principles of sovereign immunity āthe pre-abdication conduct alleged is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of this countryā.ā
In the appeal court ruling, Lady Justice Simler said Mr Justice Nicklin was āwrongā to conclude the alleged āpre-abdication conductā was āprivate conductā.
She said Juan Carlos and Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn were in an āintimate relationshipā from 2004 to 2009.
Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn alleged that, āfrom 2012, the appellant engaged in a course of conduct amounting to harassmentā.
āI emphasise at this stage that there has, as yet, been no decision about whether any of the allegations she makes are true,ā the judge said.
āThe appellant emphatically denies that he engaged in, or directed, any harassment of the respondent and rejects her allegations to the contrary as untrue.ā