Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sir James Dyson loses libel claim against Daily Mirror publisher

The inventor appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in November.

Jess Glass
Friday 01 December 2023 05:44 EST
Sir James Dyson sued for libel over an article in the Daily Mirror newspaper (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Sir James Dyson sued for libel over an article in the Daily Mirror newspaper (Gareth Fuller/PA) (PA Wire)

Sir James Dyson has lost his libel claim against the publisher of the Daily Mirror.

The inventor, 76, gave evidence at the Royal Courts of Justice over two days in a trial against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) over an article published in January 2022.

In the Daily Mirror article, journalist Brian Reade referred to the engineer as ā€œthe vacuum-cleaner tycoon who championed Vote Leave due to the economic opportunities it would bring to British industry before moving his global head office to Singaporeā€.

Mr Reade continued: ā€œKids, talk the talk but then screw your country and if anyone complains, tell them to suck it up.ā€

Sir James brought the High Court claim against MGN, describing the allegations in the article as a ā€œvicious and vitriolicā€ personal attack.

But in a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Jay dismissed the inventorā€™s claim.

He said: ā€œIn the present case the Claimant cannot demonstrate that he has suffered financial loss as a result of these publications. Nor can he show that his philanthropic work, particularly directed to young people and schools, has been harmed in any way.ā€

During the trial, Justin Rushbrooke KC, for Sir James, said in written submissions that the articles, both in print and online, ā€œconstituted a serious and unjustified slur on Sir Jamesā€™s reputation, business and personalā€.

However, MGN defended the claim, including by arguing that Mr Readeā€™s article was ā€œhonest opinionā€.

Adrienne Page KC, for MGN, said the words in the article were ā€œsubstantially correctā€ and that Sir James could not dictate how the commentator posed them.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in