Former chief of police watchdog stepped down amid ‘shock’ at historic sex claims
Michael Lockwood, 65, faces 17 charges – for three rapes and 14 indecent assaults – relating to two 14-year-old girls.
For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
The former head of the police watchdog has told of his “shock” at historic sex claims, saying he stepped down from his high-profile role as it was “the right thing to do”.
Michael Lockwood, 65, faces 17 charges – for three rapes and 14 indecent assaults – relating to two 14-year-old girls some 40 years ago.
At the time, he was in his 20s and worked part-time at a leisure centre near Hull in East Yorkshire where he allegedly met and sexually abused the girls.
Lockwood went on to have a “distinguished” career in local government before becoming director general of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which is the police complaints watchdog for England and Wales.
One of the alleged victims, now aged in her 50s, came forward to claim she was repeatedly raped in a store cupboard and indecently assaulted in Lockwood’s Ford Capri.
A second woman later alleged Lockwood indecently assaulted her in a male toilet cubicle at the leisure centre and in the back of his mother’s car after she turned 15.
Giving evidence on Friday, Lockwood told jurors how his public profile was heightened around 2021 after police officer Wayne Couzens murdered Sarah Everard and a young black man named Chris Kaba was fatally shot, leading to protests.
He had also taken responsibility for the Grenfell Tower after the fatal fire and had been asked by bereaved families to be co-chairman of the Grenfell Memorial Trust.
Defence barrister Sarah Elliott KC asked about his reaction to being interviewed by police when allegations first emerged.
Lockwood said: “I was absolutely shocked. I did not recognise the name of the individual. Secondly, this related to events some 45 years ago.”
On being interviewed about the second woman, he said he was “particularly upset” as they had been in a relationship.
He said: “It was somebody I loved. It was a long-standing relationship.”
He insisted their sexual relationship began after she turned 16 and it was consensual.
Following the initial allegations, he decided to step down from his role at the IOPC and the Grenfell Memorial Trust in December 2022, he said.
He told jurors: “I thought it was the right thing to do. There was a lot of press interest. There were allegations made. In the interests of the organisation (IOPC), I thought it was the right thing to do to step back.
“I thought for the organisation’s sake, while these allegations were being investigated, to step aside.”
Asked about the allegations, he said: “I would never ever have engaged in sexual activity, sexual intercourse with someone under 16. I would never take advantage of anyone.”
Ms Elliott asked: “Have you ever had sex with a 14-year-old?”
The defendant replied: “No.”
Lockwood told jurors he had studied accountancy after completing a degree in geography and history at Hull University.
He lived at home and took on part-time work at the leisure centre to support his mother, who ran a grocery shop in Hull, he said.
Lockwood, who is the oldest of three siblings, told how his father had financial problems, became an alcoholic and “very sadly one day vanished from the home”, leading to his parents’ divorce.
He said: “When my dad had left, I became the main breadwinner. I always worked to help my mum out with her being on her own.”
He told jurors he had worked at the leisure centre as a pool attendant and sports hall attendant and later taught swimming and keep fit.
He had competed in national swimming events before becoming a runner at a “very serious level”, taking part in the Humber Bridge Marathon, he said.
Asked about his romantic relationships, father-of-two Lockwood said he had become engaged to a woman named Jill when he was at university and had other relationships before marrying his wife Amanda in 1996.
Ms Elliott asked about his memories of the period of the allegations against him.
Lockwood said: “It is really difficult to remember 40 years ago. It is very difficult as you would expect 40 years ago to remember where you were, what you were doing, who you were speaking to – and there are gaps.”
He said he did not remember where or when he had met the second complainant or helping her with her GCSEs but said he “always liked to support and help people”.
But he told jurors that at first, the relationship was a “friendship and nothing more”.
Ms Elliott asked: “As far as you are concerned, Mr Lockwood, was there any sexual romantic activity between you and her when she was 15?”
The defendant replied: “No.”
Asked if the age gap between them had been an issue, he said: “There was clearly an age difference we both knew about. I thought at the time she acted maturely in a grown-up way. I was quite immature at that age and I remember I was very open about the fact there was an age difference.”
The defendant said he did not recall having pulled her into a toilet at the leisure centre or other staff there “taking the mickey” or singing about them.
But he added: “At the leisure centre, people joked, played around, made comments so it was something that could have been said.”
Under cross-examination, the defendant was asked whether he “fancied” the second complainant before they embarked on a relationship.
Lockwood said: “I do not remember fancying her at that stage. I was just talking to her like I spoke to every under customer at the leisure centre.”
Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC said: “She said you took her to the gents toilet, this was a room that had a single cubicle in it.”
The defendant replied: “I do not recall that but it may have happened. I would have been absolutely clear at that stage that she was over 16 years of age.”
Lockwood was challenged about the timing of the relationship which the woman had referred to in a school exercise book, alleged to be when she was 14.
Under “dislikes”, she had listed “the way he treats me”, “lies”, “sees me just when he wants to”, “never thinks of my feelings”, “talks to another girl when I am there”, “posh speak” and “no-one can know when I go out with him”.
Mr Polnay pointed to an entry that Lockwood would “duck” in the car in case his mother saw and suggested that was because he was cheating on his fiancee.
The prosecutor said: “You say nothing happened with (the alleged victim) before she was 16 – are you sure about that?”
The defendant replied: “That is my recollection, yes.”
Lockwood, of Epsom in Surrey, denies three counts of rape and six counts of indecent assault relating to the first complainant between October 1985 and March 1986.
He has pleaded not guilty to eight indecent assaults relating to the second complainant on dates between August 1979 and August 1981.
The Old Bailey trial before Mr Justice Bennathan continues.