Parents of critically ill baby prepare for appeal after losing treatment fight
A High Court judge ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to seven-month-old Indi Gregory.
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The parents of a critically ill baby are preparing for an appeal after losing a High Court fight.
A High Court judge recently ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to seven-month-old Indi Gregory – against the wishes of her parents, Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston, Derbyshire.
Mr Justice Peel heard evidence about Indi’s condition at a private trial in the Family Division of the High Court, at the Royal Courts of Justice complex, in London.
The judge heard that Indi, who was born on February 24 2023, has mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that saps energy, and is being treated at the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham.
Specialists say she is dying and bosses at the hospital’s governing trust asked Mr Justice Peel to rule that doctors could lawfully limit treatment provided to her.
Indi’s parents are being supported by campaign group the Christian Legal Centre.
A spokesman for the centre said a Court of Appeal hearing was due to be staged in London on Monday October 23.
Barrister Emma Sutton KC, who led Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s legal team, told Mr Justice Peel that Indi was critically ill and had an exceptionally rare and devastating neurometabolic disorder.
She said the treatment Indi received caused pain and was futile.
Mr Gregory told Mr Justice Peel that his daughter had “proved everyone wrong” and needed “more time”.
Mr Justice Peel considered evidence behind closed doors but allowed journalists to attend the hearing and ruled that Indi, her parents and the hospital can be named in reports.
He ruled that medics treating Indi, and a guardian appointed to represent her interests, could not be named.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.