Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parents of critically ill baby prepare for appeal after losing treatment fight

A High Court judge ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to seven-month-old Indi Gregory.

Brian Farmer
Wednesday 18 October 2023 11:29 EDT
āœ•
Close
Charlie Gard: Parents end legal battle over treatment for terminally-ill baby

The parents of a critically ill baby are preparing for an appeal after losing a High Court fight.

A High Court judge recently ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to seven-month-old Indi Gregory ā€“ against the wishes of her parents, Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston, Derbyshire.

Mr Justice Peel heard evidence about Indiā€™s condition at a private trial in the Family Division of the High Court, at the Royal Courts of Justice complex, in London.

The judge heard that Indi, who was born on February 24 2023,Ā has mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that saps energy, and is being treated at the Queenā€™s Medical Centre in Nottingham.

Specialists say she is dying and bosses at the hospitalā€™s governing trust asked Mr Justice Peel to rule that doctors could lawfully limit treatment provided to her.

Indiā€™s parents are being supported by campaign group the Christian Legal Centre.

A spokesman for the centre said a Court of Appeal hearing was due to be staged in London on Monday October 23.

Barrister Emma Sutton KC, who led Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustā€™s legal team, told Mr Justice Peel that Indi was critically ill and had an exceptionally rare and devastating neurometabolic disorder.

She said the treatmentĀ IndiĀ received caused pain and was futile.

Mr Gregory told Mr Justice Peel that his daughter had ā€œproved everyone wrongā€ and needed ā€œmore timeā€.

Mr Justice Peel considered evidence behind closed doors but allowed journalists to attend the hearing and ruled that Indi, her parents and the hospital can be named in reports.

He ruled that medics treating Indi, and a guardian appointed to represent her interests, could not be named.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in