Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Britain’s Got Talent singer’s £43m damages claim thrown out of High Court

Robert Aslanyan’s claim was described as ‘completely without merit’ by a judge on Friday.

Callum Parke
Friday 26 July 2024 11:54 EDT
A man who was suing the makers of Britain’s Got Talent has seen his case thrown out (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
A man who was suing the makers of Britain’s Got Talent has seen his case thrown out (Jordan Pettitt/PA) (PA Archive)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

A Britain’s Got Talent contestant who sued the show’s producers for more than £40 million has had his claim thrown out at the High Court.

Robert Aslanyan filed legal action against Fremantle Media Limited in October last year, claiming it acted negligently by failing to notify him that an audition during the Covid pandemic had been cancelled.

He also claimed it breached a contract with him by failing to decide his application.

Fremantle opposed the claim and applied to the court for it to be dismissed, with Judge Mark Gidden ruling in a hearing on Friday that Mr Aslanyan’s case was “hopeless” and “completely without merit”.

The defendant maintains that this claim is unwinnable, it is right to be struck out, in fact, it is something of a mercy to end the claim now, and I agree

Judge Mark Gidden

The judge said: “The defendant maintains that this claim is unwinnable, it is right to be struck out, in fact, it is something of a mercy to end the claim now, and I agree.”

He added that the claim was “flawed” and “has already gone on long enough”, instead ordering that Mr Aslanyan pay £48,188.50 in legal costs within 28 days.

Judge Gidden said that Mr Aslanyan planned to perform a song named Our Mother Queen for series 15 of the programme, which he dedicated to the then-monarch, Queen Elizabeth II.

The judge continued that performing the song was Mr Aslanyan’s “great aspiration” and that he anticipated “it would yield a very life-changing commercial success”, the value of which he placed at “just over £43 million”.

Mr Aslanyan had represented himself in the claim and did not attend Friday’s online hearing.

Mark Winden, for Fremantle Media, told the court that Mr Aslanyan applied six times for “at least the last four” series of Britain’s Got Talent, the 17th of which concluded earlier this year, but never got through to an audition before the celebrity judging panel.

After applying for series 15 in 2020, Mr Aslanyan was later mistakenly invited to attend an in-person audition in December 2021, but no physical auditions were taking place due to the Covid pandemic.

Mr Winden said that Mr Aslanyan travelled to Cardiff with several family members for the audition, despite being sent an email by the producers confirming that the original invite was sent “in error”.

The lawyer added that a “basic sense check” would have told Mr Aslanyan that the invitation was false and that he “should have understood” that it was a mistake.

Mr Winden continued that Mr Aslanyan’s claim argued that the company was “contractually obliged” to inform him of its decision related to his application, and to make its decision “strictly based on artistic performance”.

But the court was told that producers had not breached the show’s rules nor been negligent towards Mr Aslanyan, with Mr Winden claiming the producers had “unfettered discretion” over applications for the competition.

The barrister said that the claim “set out no basis” for how Mr Aslanyan had lost the money he was asking for, adding that it was “unwinnable” and “should not have been brought in the first place”.

He said: “He has had many auditions for his acts. The issue was that none of them were before the celebrity judges.”

He continued: “This claim does not disclose any legally recognisable claim against the defendant and so it is a claim suitable for strike out.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in