Trade union’s legal challenge over Rwanda Act to be heard at High Court
The FDA previously said it was bringing legal action over the relationship between the Civil Service Code and the Act.
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The FDA trade union’s legal challenge over the Government’s Safety of Rwanda Act is set to be heard at the High Court.
The trade union, which represents senior civil servants, previously said it was bringing legal action over the relationship of the Civil Service Code with the Government’s Safety of Rwanda Act.
The claim against the Cabinet Office is due to be heard on Thursday at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.
The FDA’s challenge concerns guidance from the Cabinet Office to civil servants which says they will be acting in line with the Civil Service Code if they follow a minster’s decision to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda, even if a Rule 39 measure has been made.
The claimant says that this guidance is wrong in law and that civil servants would be acting contrary to the code, as presently drafted, and therefore contrary to their terms and conditions of employment, if they acted contrary to such an interim measure
A Rule 39 interim measure from the European Court of Human Rights – branded a “pyjama injunction” because it can be issued outside normal court hours – contributed to the grounding in 2022 of the first flight that was set to carry asylum seekers to Rwanda.
In an order last month, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: “The claimant says that this guidance is wrong in law and that civil servants would be acting contrary to the code, as presently drafted, and therefore contrary to their terms and conditions of employment, if they acted contrary to such an interim measure.”
No decision on the legal challenge is expected to be made at Thursday’s hearing, which is due to begin at 10.30am.
The hearing comes after the Government told the court in a different case that it now plans to begin removals to Rwanda in late July.
At the start of a hearing on Monday in a challenge brought by charity Asylum Aid, the court heard the first flight is now planned for July 24.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.