‘Cruel’ doctor accused of carrying out circumcisions with rusty tool without proper pain relief
Mohammad Siddiqui is accused of causing ‘unnecessary pain, suffering, cruelty and risk’
For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
A “cruel” former doctor used a rusty medical instrument to carry out circumcisions on young boys and failed to give them sufficient pain relief, a court has heard.
Mohammad Siddiqui, 58, is accused of failing to properly sterilise his medical toolkit, with police finding a number of medical items in his car, including one with a “hook and serrated wheel showing signs of rust… and skin on it”
Southwark Crown Court heard that he was a practising doctor when he started visiting homes by appointment to carry out circumcisions within the Muslim community.
He was suspended and later struck off by the General Medical Council (GMC), but continued to carry out circumcisions anyway, with one boy left needing to be taken to hospital by ambulance.
Siddiqui, from Birmingham, carried out his procedures “as quickly as possible to maximise profits”, prosecutor Ben Douglas-Jones KC said.
He “cut corners” and “caused unnecessary pain, suffering, cruelty and risk”.
Police also found a “circumcision immobiliser” in the back of his Toyota car, a device used to hold children in place during circumcisions and considered unacceptable in NHS practice.
Subsequent testing revealed many of Siddiqui’s instruments had not been properly sterilised, Mr Douglas-Jones said.
Siddiqui used anaesthetic cream on some of his patients but often began procedures just “a few minutes” after administering it, jurors were told.
A boy who was 15 when he was circumcised by Siddiqui was left with “a lot of bleeding” and had to be taken to hospital by ambulance for surgery, the court heard.
In a pre-recorded police interview played to the court, the boy, who cannot be named, said the bleeding started about 20-30 minutes after the former doctor had left his home.
The boy’s mother tried to call Siddiqui for help, but he “wouldn’t pick up”, the court heard.
Siddiqui was booked to circumcise the boy as well as his younger brothers, then aged six and three, for “religious reasons”, jurors heard.
He arrived with medical equipment and sheets, and carried out the procedures on a table after applying an anaesthetic cream, the court heard.
The boy told officers Siddiqui had charged about £150 to £200 to circumcise his brothers, and “£300 plus” for him because he was older.
The children were advised by Siddiqui to use Vaseline if they were “sore after”, the court heard.
The boy, who was left needing stitches, said: “I trusted that he was a proper doctor, so I didn’t have any worries.”
When interviewed by police in 2019, Siddiqui, who specialised in circumcisions when he was a practising doctor, said he had carried out 1,200 to 1,500 such procedures since 2012, the court heard.
He told police it was sometimes “difficult to know” if anaesthetic cream was working because babies might cry for “a number of reasons”.
Siddiqui, who is representing himself, asked the judge if he could address the jury after Mr Douglas-Jones had finished delivering his opening.
Judge Noel Lucas KC told the former doctor he had “no right” to do so “at this time” before jurors were asked to leave the courtroom.
Siddiqui carried his laptop and document bundles in a carboard box to bring them in and out of the courtroom, and was accompanied by a prison guard.
He denies 39 charges including 17 counts of actual bodily harm, 14 of child cruelty and eight of administering a prescription-only medicine between 2014 and 2019.
The charges relate to 23 incidents against as many complainants.
The trial continues.