Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wagatha Christie timeline: How the Vardy v Rooney libel battle played out

The build-up to the High Court trial.

Tom Pilgrim
Wednesday 18 May 2022 21:45 EDT
Court sketch of Rebekah Vardy giving evidence in the ā€˜Wagatha Christieā€™ trial as Coleen Rooney and her husband Wayne watch on (Elizabeth Cook/PA)
Court sketch of Rebekah Vardy giving evidence in the ā€˜Wagatha Christieā€™ trial as Coleen Rooney and her husband Wayne watch on (Elizabeth Cook/PA) (PA Wire)

After a week of courtroom drama, the ā€œWagatha Christieā€ trial is set to enter its final day.

Here is how the libel row between footballersā€™ wives Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy reached the High Court in London:

ā€“ September 2017 to October 2019 ā€“ The Sun newspaper runs a number of articles about Mrs Rooney, including that she travelled to Mexico to look into baby ā€œgender selectionā€ treatment, her plan to revive her TV career and the flooding of her basement.

ā€“ October 9 2019 ā€“ Mrs Rooney uses social media to accuse Mrs Vardy of selling stories from her private Instagram account to the tabloids.

Mrs Rooney says she spent five months attempting to work out who was sharing information about her and her family based on posts she had made on her personal social media page.

After sharing a series of ā€œfalseā€ stories and using a process of elimination, Mrs Rooney claims they were viewed by one Instagram account, belonging to Mrs Vardy.

Mrs Vardy, then pregnant with her fifth child, denies the allegations and says various people had access to her Instagram over the years.

She claims to be ā€œso upsetā€ by Mrs Rooneyā€™s accusation, later adding: ā€œI thought she was my friend but she completely annihilated me.ā€

The public dispute makes headlines around the world, with the hashtag #WagathaChristie trending.

ā€“ February 13 2020 ā€“ In a tearful appearance on ITVā€™s Loose Women, Mrs Vardy says the stress of the dispute caused her to have severe anxiety attacks and she ā€œended up in hospital three timesā€.

Mrs Rooney says in a statement that she does not want to ā€œengage in further public debateā€.

ā€“ June 23 2020 ā€“ It emerges that Mrs Vardy has launched libel proceedings against Mrs Rooney.

Mrs Vardyā€™s lawyers allegeĀ she ā€œsuffered extreme distress, hurt, anxiety and embarrassment as a result of the publication of the post and the events which followedā€.

ā€“ November 19-20 2020 ā€“ The libel battle has its first High Court hearing in London.

A judge rules that Mrs Rooneyā€™s October 2019 post ā€œclearly identifiedā€ Mrs Vardy as being ā€œguilty of the serious and consistent breach of trustā€.

Mr Justice Warby concludes that the ā€œnatural and ordinaryā€ meaning of the posts was that Mrs Vardy had ā€œregularly and frequently abused her status as a trusted follower of Mrs Rooneyā€™s personal Instagram account by secretly informing The Sun of Mrs Rooneyā€™s private posts and storiesā€.

ā€“ February 8-9 2022 ā€“ A series of explosive messages between Mrs Vardy and her agent Caroline Watt ā€“ which Mrs Rooneyā€™s lawyers allege were about her ā€“ are revealed at a preliminary court hearing.

The court is told Mrs Vardy was not referring to Mrs Rooney when she called someone a ā€œnasty bitchā€ in one exchange with Ms Watt.

Mrs Rooneyā€™s lawyers seek further information from the WhatsApp messages, but the court is told that Ms Wattā€™s phone fell into the North Sea after a boat she was on hit a wave, before further information could be extracted from it.

ā€“ February 14 ā€“ Mrs Rooney is refused permission to bring a High Court claim against Ms Watt for misuse of private information to be heard alongside the libel battle.

A High Court judge, Mrs Justice Steyn, says the bid was brought too late and previous opportunities to make the claim had not been taken.

ā€“ April 13 ā€“ Ms Watt is not fit to give oral evidence at the upcoming libel trial, the High Court is told as the case returns for another hearing.

The agent revokes permission for her witness statement to be used, and withdraws her waiver which would have allowed Sun journalists to say whether she was a source of the allegedly leaked stories.

ā€“ April 29 ā€“ Mrs Vardy ā€œappears to acceptā€ that her agent was the source of allegedly leaked stories, Mrs Rooneyā€™s barrister David Sherborne tells the High Court.

He argues that a new witness statement submitted by Mrs Vardy suggests Ms Watt was the source but Mrs Vardy claims she ā€œdid not authorise or condone herā€.

Mrs Vardyā€™s lawyer Hugh Tomlinson says the statement did not contain ā€œany change whatever in the pleaded caseā€, with her legal team having no communication with Ms Watt.

ā€“ May 10-17 ā€“ Mrs Vardy and Mrs Rooney come face to face in court as the trial of their libel battle takes place at the Royal Courts of Justice in London before Mrs Justice Steyn. Both women give evidence, as revelations from the case make daily headlines across the British press.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in