Competitiveness White Paper: Planning pleas: Concern over proposal for 'fast-track' decisions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DEVELOPERS should be able to pay local councils to get a rapid decision for or against major planning applications, the White Paper proposes.
The payments would allow council planning chiefs to recruit extra staff to help weigh up the pros and cons of a large proposed development. In return, the council would have to guarantee a timetable for making a decision on the application.
There are fears, however, that paying for 'fast-track' planning decisions could be seen as prejudicing councils towards granting permission that would otherwise have been refused.
The Royal Town Planning Institute said the proposal was 'fundamentally misguided' and 'could raise questions about propriety'. But the Association of Metropolitan Authorities gave it a guarded welcome.
The Government believes applications for big developments such as shopping, industrial and office complexes which could boost economic growth should not be held up for months awaiting planning permission.
Yet such developments demand thousands of hours of work by planning officers, investigating their impact on the environment, the local road network, and so on.
At present, developers have to pay a fee for their applications which varies according to the size and type of the development. The maximum, pounds 10,500, is not enough to cover even half the cost of processing a major proposal.
Philip Swan, of the Association of Metropolitan Authorities, said: 'There's some merit in the Government's proposal, but paying for a fast-track decision must not become confused with being paid to say 'yes'.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments