Companies to conduct own checks on pollution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SOME OF Britain's worst polluters will monitor their own discharges into rivers as part of a shift in surveillance responsibility from the National Rivers Authority to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution, writes Steve Connor.
The Department of the Environment said the changes already applied to effluent discharges from combustion plants and will be extended over the next four years. Under the new scheme, firms will routinely monitor their own effluent for toxic chemicals.
The pollution inspectorate will carry out random spot checks to verify a company's samples.
The new measures are part of the Department of the Environment's policy of 'integrated pollution control', where many of the powers of the rivers authority to control and monitor water pollution are transferred to the inspectorate, which has a much smaller monitoring team.
Environmental groups criticised the move because the rivers authority has earned itself a track record in pursuing polluters. It took 282 incidents to court in 1990 and secured convictions in 272 of them. This compares with just nine companies prosecuted by the pollution inspectorate between 1987 and 1991.
Tim Birch, water pollution campaigner at Greenpeace, said: 'The performance of the pollution inspectorate is nothing short of appalling. Asking polluters to police themselves is ridiculous . . . We are now back to a situation where industry is both poacher and gamekeeper.'
A spokeswoman for the Department of the Environment said that the pollution inspectorate would still be the overseeing body for monitoring water discharges.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments