Christians focus on question of abortion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHRISTIANS of every shade of opinion about homosexual behaviour yesterday condemned the prospect of aborting 'gay' embryos.
Dr Patrick Dixon, who runs an evangelical charity for Aids victims, said: 'Every new gene discovery brings closer the horror of eugenics - designer families for tomorrow's parents with embryos selected for intelligence, hair colour or sexual orientation.'
The Rev Tony Higton, the Church of England's leading campaigner against homosexual clergy, said: 'I am deeply concerned that this discovery might lead to selective breeding. What I'm really against is any discarding of human embryos at any stage.'
However, Mr Higton and Dr Dixon rejected the suggestion that a genetic explanation legitimised homosexual behaviour. 'I don't think this changes the moral question one iota,' Mr Higton said. 'To explain the origin of a tendency is not to justify the behaviour.'
Dr Dixon drew a comparison with genetically-carried crippling diseases such as cystic fibrosis. 'The Christian view is that the genes in themselves are morally neutral: the question is how we choose to live with them.'
Liberals, however, felt the discovery would lead to increased tolerance of homosexual behaviour.
Professor John Bowker, a former Dean of Trinity College, Cambridge, said that the discovery destroyed the argument that homosexuality was against nature. 'In terms of natural selection, there must have been some advantage to the human group as a whole for it to have survived. Perhaps it was an advantage to have not everyone preoccupied with breeding.'
The Rev Richard Kirker, leader of the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement, said: 'It obviously makes our case infinitely easier to argue, but one does not want to become dependent on any one theory which may turn out to be inadequate or wrong.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments