Labour should make standards in public life an issue at next election – Bryant
The Commons Standards Committee chair said discipline should be taken out of the hands of party whips and given to an independent body.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour should make standards in public life an issue at the next election, a senior MP has said.
Speaking on the day Boris Johnson was found to have deliberately misled Parliament during the Partygate scandal, Commons Standards Committee chair Sir Chris Bryant suggested standards had deteriorated and would be an electoral issue.
He said: “You could say that there is nothing new under the sun, but I’m not so sure. I suspect we have a rum lot in this Parliament.”
I think that this will be an issue in the general election, it will be, and Labour should make it one to be honest
He added: “But I think the big thing that is different in this Parliament is what I call the Mogg tendency. That’s the ‘Oh really, does this matter? The people in the Dog and Duck, they’re not talking about this stuff’, and I think that that is profoundly dangerous because it’s effectively a free pass for bad behaviour.”
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, a strong ally of Mr Johnson, is one of a number of Conservative MPs who have criticised the findings of the Privileges Committee investigation into the former prime minister.
Sir Chris made his comments at a conference organised by Queen Mary University’s Mile End Institute on Thursday.
He added: “I would add Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak to this list, it’s fairly consistent, I think, now and they just get away with it – and they’ve got a system for correcting the record which has been in place since 2007.
Labour’s got to come up with a set of proposals on how we are going to improve things. I know that Keir (Starmer) is very focused on that
“So I’m worried about that, but I also think that this will be an issue in the general election, it will be, and Labour should make it one to be honest.
“That means Labour’s got to come up with a set of proposals on how we are going to improve things. I know that Keir (Starmer) is very focused on that.”
Both Mr Sunak and Ms Braverman have been accused of using incorrect statistics in Parliament in recent weeks. Mr Sunak had to correct the parliamentary record in May after claiming there were “record numbers” of people in work, while Ms Braverman was accused of incorrectly claiming the asylum backlog had decreased while making a statement to the Commons on June 5.
Sir Chris also suggested that discipline should be taken out of the hands of party whips and given exclusively to Parliament’s Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme.
(Today) is a good day for Parliament because a committee of Parliament has shown that it cannot be cowed, it can be effective, and I believe the Privileges Committee has reached the right conclusion
He said: “It would mean that it would be kept confidential, which is better for both sides of the argument, for the complainant and the respondent, and it means that nobody’s just trying to protect the party.”
Former cabinet secretary Lord Butler also spoke at Thursday’s event, saying the Privileges Committee’s report was “a good day for Parliament”.
He said: “My remedy is the old-fashioned one. It’s the ‘good chaps’ principle, and if ever there was an example of it, we see it today.
“I think a lot of the low standards which we have seen in the last few years have come from the top of Government and the top of Government has shown it has not stood up for high standards.
“But today, I think, is a good day. It is a good day for Parliament because a committee of Parliament has shown that it cannot be cowed, it can be effective, and I believe the Privileges Committee has reached the right conclusion.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.